Saturday, 9 April 2011
Forestry Commission Response
Anyone with a view on the grant supported work done in the woodland by contractors working for SWT may wish to read the papers relating to this which have come through a Freedom of Information request. The papers are now publicly available and can be accessed here. Comments sent in on behalf of this blog can also be seen along with highlighted comments from SWT and the FC, SWT in blue and FC in red print. 
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Isn't that interesting - SWT are now talking about the SHEFFIELD MOORS PARTNERSHIP in their comments on your consultation response to their EWGS application!!! They must also, like the RSPB, think it is a done deal that that the Sheffield Moors of Burbage, Hathersage and Houndkirk, will be offloaded onto the Eastern Moors Partnership. These NGOs just stitch up everything between themselves like little boys behind the bike shed.
I pointed out in my response to the EWGS that SWT were unlikley to have the authority to create that new bridleway. The fact that they have gone ahead and trashed a bit of Blacka just shows their level of incompetence.
Post a Comment