Question: Why no consultation about the Agri Environment Scheme and the other ways of this being funded? Is this public land or is it not? Where is the money coming from? How much from public funds controlled by Natural England? How much from Why no consultation about the Agri Environment Scheme and the other ways of this being funded? Is this public land or not? Where is the money coming from? How much from public funds from PDNPA and how much from members of NT and RSPB? Is EMP a separate charity? Will it submit its accounts to the Charity Commission?
Answer: There is no requirement for the EMP to publish accounts. It is not a separate charity but managed by a collaboration agreement between the NT and RSPB The land is still in public ownership by the PDNPA. They contribute for the next two years. The Charities both contribute a significant amount. The Eastern Moors will become a model for management of the uplands and in doing that will demonstrate the costs involved in managing an area like this. The input of agri-environment is vital if we want to continue the public benefits that the Eastern Moors brings.I daresay "The input of agri-environment is vital if we want to continue the public benefits...." would be echoed by Sheffield Wildlife Trust. Because the public benefits brought to Blacka by agri environment schemes included the following.
Already We Don't
How Favoured We Are
No Farmland Here ?
No comments:
Post a Comment