The statement from RSPB*/Eastern Moors dated 13th March was issued
only to those expressing concern about their cull. And that came only
after the cull was publicised by Friends of Blacka Moor in the Sheffield Telegraph and on the Sheffield
Forum. That indicates an intention to keep the decision quiet and only to
respond if the whistle was blown. It’s categorically not transparency. In fact it indicates a disrespect for the public,
some may say contempt. The implication is that people in general cannot be
trusted to understand their actions in these complex matters.
(Just think if voting
in general elections was organised in this way: Parties keep their plans close
to their chests and only disclose when put under pressure, leaving most of us ‘plebs’ in the dark.)
The statement comes across as carefully calibrated almost certainly
with help from RSPB’s high command amongst its bureaucratariat at The Lodge where, of course, there’s no
direct knowledge of local situations but ample experience of managing people.
It confirms that conservation industry operatives feel
qualified to act as God. As we know “God moves in a mysterious way, his wonders
to perform” so has no obligation to justify his actions.
I rather like this comment on a bible website
“I absolutely love this verse. God is always doing things
and Im always asking why... i never understand. But what he does is always for
a reason. I may not understand right now but later I will.”
That sums up the attitude most large organizations hope to see in their supporters.
Let’s just examine one of the arguments RSPB puts forward in
this statement to justify a shooting policy:
“If left unchecked the
deer numbers will grow to a point where the deer themselves over utilise the resources
on the moors and have to spread further afield to find food and shelter,
reducing the amount of wildlife
the moors can support”
This is assuming
they spend all their time already on Big Moor. Some may, but others already wander
across further parts of Sheffield Moors as acknowledged earlier in the
statement. There’s no indication that the management understands the balance
across the whole area of deer impact nor any idea that they have considered impacts on Blacka and
elsewhere. Nor do they tell us that farm animals will be removed!
Another fine touch
is the conclusion:
the cull will be:
“carried out by
professionals in deer management in a sensitive and respectful way to both deer
and other wildlife on site, with minimal disruption to how the public enjoy the moors”
Hands up those who believe the person who wrote this had personal experience of the conscientiousness and humane approach of the men with guns. Imaginations must be racing away trying to put an image to this respectful shooting. Will prayers be said for example? And shouldn't something be added at the end, such as .......
"...minimal disruption to how the public enjoy the moors .. and their roast venison"
* National Trust is an equal partner.
"...minimal disruption to how the public enjoy the moors .. and their roast venison"
* National Trust is an equal partner.
No comments:
Post a Comment